“Anti-muffler Modification Ordinance of 2013”

[UltraVires]

---

Ayaw lang ko tawaga ug atty, sir kay "we are all forumers" here.
With regard to your example sir and in relation to this ordinance,in my point of view, ang una natong pangutana is why did our LGU created such ordinance? What is the cause? What are their bases? What good does it do to our society? When did induced noise pollution become acceptable? What part of the world does pollution co-exist with safety?
Is it because others are abusing it to the point where their "claims" that installing such open mufflers would guarantee them of their safety? in which, what we usually see on motorcycle related accidents exposed the exact opposite?
What the LGUs are trying to impose here is the regulation of open mufflers for the reason that mc related accidents are rising not only due to the rise of mc users but due to the stereotypically embedded concept of "when you have an open muffler, you will be noticeable to other vehicles on the road."
Which is a very contradicting fact when the majority are talking about safety yet remove the essential parts of their mc with regard to safety...up to the point of questioning the apprehension of not wearing proper gears ie: helmets, footwears, pads etc

On the noise part, of course common sense should, supposedly play a large part on this but unfortunately the opposite prevailed. ie: inappropriate use of loud mufflers on residential areas? Imagine the discomfort you could give to other people? How will the govt suppose to regulate this? By allowing you to bring an additional silent muffler whenyou enter a such areas, imagine the hassle?
In short, the approach of this ordinace is to regulate the problem for the general interest and that includes us.
But again, this cannot materialize for now for we lack the equiptments.
For now, we can just ask humbly to be responsible enough to know how "loud is loud"

- - - Updated - - -

o sakto na imong gi-ingon, in your point of view Atty. pero naa sad tay matawag ug "HAMBOG" nga "PAREHA NIMO" sa among point of view... ug wala sad diay ka kahibaw nga ang taw dili maka storya kung dili mugamit ug utok?... ayaw sa pag hukmI ang taw kung wala ka kaila sa imong gi-istoryahan.

Contradicting claim.
You are now attacking me? When i only talked about the idea? Hmmm
And threat me with "wa ko kaila sa akong gistoryahan?"

[gino_lambating]

Ayaw lang ko tawaga ug atty, sir kay "we are all forumers" here.
With regard to your example sir and in relation to this ordinance,in my point of view, ang una natong pangutana is why did our LGU created such ordinance? What is the cause? What are their bases? What good does it do to our society? When did induced noise pollution become acceptable? What part of the world does pollution co-exist with safety?
Is it because others are abusing it to the point where their "claims" that installing such open mufflers would guarantee them of their safety? in which, what we usually see on motorcycle related accidents exposed the exact opposite?
What the LGUs are trying to impose here is the regulation of open mufflers for the reason that mc related accidents are rising not only due to the rise of mc users but due to the stereotypically embedded concept of "when you have an open muffler, you will be noticeable to other vehicles on the road."
Which is a very contradicting fact when the majority are talking about safety yet remove the essential parts of their mc with regard to safety...up to the point of questioning the apprehension of not wearing proper gears ie: helmets, footwears, pads etc

On the noise part, of course common sense should, supposedly play a large part on this but unfortunately the opposite prevailed. ie: inappropriate use of loud mufflers on residential areas? Imagine the discomfort you could give to other people? How will the govt suppose to regulate this? By allowing you to bring an additional silent muffler whenyou enter a such areas, imagine the hassle?
In short, the approach of this ordinace is to regulate the problem for the general interest and that includes us.
But again, this cannot materialize for now for we lack the equiptments.
For now, we can just ask humbly to be responsible enough to know how "loud is loud"

aw sige sir na lang... naanad ko motawag ug Atty sa mga abugado gud.. anyway, balik tas topic.. tagsa tagsaon nako ug tubag na sir..

1. why did our LGU created such ordinance? ANS. in my opinion, saba gyud sir.. mao bitaw ni uyon ko sa balaud kay alingog ngog na kaayo ang dalan unya mo puno pa ang uban motorista ug saba nga tambutso, naka mugna na ug noise pollution.. pero kung e open lang nato atong mind noh, naa man pud diay open muffler nga hilum sir, kung naka kita ka aning gitawag nila ug silent power pipe unya ibutang sa stock engine lang, hilum ra gyud siya sir, ang iyang tingug maguwang ra gyud gamay sa stock muffler.. so, nakakita ko ani nga option as replacement sa akong stock muffler inig abot sa panahun maguba na siya..

2. What is the cause? ANS. noise pollution kay di pud ikalimud nga daghan kaayong muffler nga pwersang sabaa.. maka pungot labi nag muagi sa residential area unya hinanok ang tulog sa atong baby.. 1st hand experience gyud nako na sir.. mao usahay makahuna huna tag dautan tungod sa ilang kasaba.. akong point is naa tay sukdanan unsa ka saba ang saba..

3. What are their bases? ANS. wa koy nakita.. kay sa akong pagkahibaw basta di na stock muffler dakup na.. tingale lang ha, mao tingale nga wa pa ma approve ni nga ordinance kay wa pa silay saktong basihan.. walay standards unsa kasaba ang saba..

4. What good does it do to our society? ANS. aw di na malalis, sama sa ako gi ingon nimu sir uyon ko ani nga balaud.. kung ma approve ni kay malipay ko.. pero ako balikon ako kaugalingon, dapat naa sukod para fair sa tanan..

5. When did induced noise pollution become acceptable? ANS. acceptable ba ang noise pollution? di man tingale.. ma reduced nato na sa paagi nga pagpasar ani nga balaud nga dugay kong hinuwat.. pero dapat ang balaud fair sa tanan..

6. What part of the world does pollution co-exist with safety? ANS. ang uban mo ingon loud pipes save lives, disagree ko ana. para nako bullsh!t na.. kay kasagaran naka loud pipe mugara man hinoon padagan, mokiat kay feeling racer na kaayo so maka cause hinoon ug disgrasya..

7. Is it because others are abusing it to the point where their "claims" that installing such open mufflers would guarantee them of their safety? in which, what we usually see on motorcycle related accidents exposed the exact opposite? ANS. same answer sa akong number 6.

8. What the LGUs are trying to impose here is the regulation of open mufflers for the reason that mc related accidents are rising not only due to the rise of mc users but due to the stereotypically embedded concept of "when you have an open muffler, you will be noticeable to other vehicles on the road."
Which is a very contradicting fact when the majority are talking about safety yet remove the essential parts of their mc with regard to safety...up to the point of questioning the apprehension of not wearing proper gears ie: helmets, footwears, pads etc.
ANS.
murag wa koy angay itubag ana sir kay sama sa ako gi ingon ganina ni uyon ko ani nga balaud.. pero again, dapat fair sa tanan..

[wingwing79]

ah mao diay kay SMART ka ic.... ingon si Jules Romains. even the ideas are wrong diba?... hehehe peace.

[UltraVires]

The most sensible answer i have read so far sir.
Claims supported by evidence.
One trait of a good leader.
Two thumbs up for you.

[kahrosi]

in short ani dapat fair sa tanan..

hai salamatz nahuman na gyud akong popcorn

[$leeper]

mura'g daghan pa nga popcorn gikinahanglan ani, sis...

[necrotic freak]

@gino_lambating pre imo man gi self incriminate si torni.

[nijazared]

Wala sab kalahi an ang taw nga di mogamit sa utok una mostorya ug sa taw nga walay tarong pangutok.
Based on your pretence[sic], you do know our constitution is in accordance with the holy book, perhaps?

- - - Updated - - -



Ang hambog sir in your consideration is kanang mga taw nga maghisgut ug butang nga sila mismo walay alamag ug dili kasabot.
Ug sa tinod anay nga kinabuhi nila wa gyud diay ikabuga. Bisag sa papel nalang.

Braggadocio - empty boasting

on the topic, di gyud ni ma approve.

OT: Each has his own perception, perhaps we just find too much information and trivia in a post as "boasting". Or maybe we're just used to getting to the point and we leave out the rest of the details. To quote, "a wise man is of few words"

uyon ko anang gisulti nga di gyud ni ma approve ky wa jud klaro...but just in case, nangandam nlng ko muffler with silencer ky wala naman jud ako stock nga muffler...

[UltraVires]

OT: Each has his own perception, perhaps we just find too much information and trivia in a post as "boasting". Or maybe we're just used to getting to the point and we leave out the rest of the details. To quote, "a wise man is of few words"

uyon ko anang gisulti nga di gyud ni ma approve ky wa jud klaro...but just in case, nangandam nlng ko muffler with silencer ky wala naman jud ako stock nga muffler...

If i should take your quote literally then perhaps based on the cited words adjoined describes a 200 page decision by the justices as inferior to your level of intellect. How overwhelming.
I should personally shake your hand sir.

- - - Updated - - -

@gino_lambating pre imo man gi self incriminate si torni.

Do you know the technicalities of self incrimination? Or basin sa napoles case lang ka naka encounter ana? Lol

[Unleash]

Maygani cge ko dala sa akong Silencer.. hihihihihi.. mo dha..