Butangi! OT naman ni. Pero OT'han pa nako ug gamay ha.Chance please.
Naa pako posts quota apason diri kay sayang ilang gibayad nako.
Bahin aning "guro" "guro" na word. Ani man gud ni:
In an argument naay dili mo uyon ug mo uyon(light and dark) aron masabtan. Ug naay gitawag nato ug somewhere in-between
So let's take an example bahin aning rice hoarding:
1. 2200 lost containers were lost in Pnoy's time which I may agree based on the link BUT when he says "guro" naay nawala before ni Pnoy pero less than a "100 lang" is not only an opinion but a "bias opinion". Is it because he is green and the other one is yellow? You gave a figure, "less than a hundred". You are implying to us that the current admin is "more" corrupt than the previous one. One-sided people think that way.
"If you are in the middle, you would say that in
"Pnoy's time 2200 containers where lost but "guro" in the previous admin naa pud nangawala pero wala lang ta kibaw pila jud". This statement doesn't imply to us that the current admin is more corrupt than the others. It only tells us that there are lost containers before but we don't know how many
No bias here. Simply I don't know that's why I didn't gave figures.
So like I said before, please stay in the middle aron makakita mo both sides sa story. Forget about colors, be in the middle.
Bash him if he commits mistakes(This is only after you've dig into the "real" story. Dili kay abi naay usa ka tawo ni sulti nga mao ni mao na, too lang pud ka dayon without verifying it yourself)
OR
gave him credit where it's due(After verifying if it really exists and he has hands on it). No matter how small it is, a credit is a credit. It is hard to give credit to someone you hate
"If walay color imong prinsipyo, dili ka mauwaw ug mahadlok mo supak or uyon sa usa ka tawo"